January 2, 2019
T-Series is going to become the biggest channel on YouTube. Think about that for a second. YouTube serves 1.9 billion people a month globally. India, has been its largest and fastest growing market. The platform is now building features for Indian users, and taking those products to the world, like offline video. The #1 Trending Video on YouTube is not a sketch in English (or Despacito), it’s likely a compilation of videos from TikTok (née Musical.ly). The future of education is being shaped on YouTube, by a Chennai-based studio named ChuChu TV. The most expensive reach builder media property in the country is the YouTube masthead. This isn’t by accident, either. According to Google, 90 percent of all content consumed on YouTube is in local languages.
Further, the Jio story is well-narrated, but the surprising story is not about cheaper data driving smartphone growth (or vice versa). That’s been on the cards for as far back as 2010. What’s barely been given attention is the emergent behaviors on by users with no conception of the internet’s rules, at scale.
Brand builders for the next billion rightfully have a share of the spotlight. Who would have imagined a few years ago that Ramdev Baba would lead the cover of Bloomberg and set the agenda for Indian political reportage of The New York Times? As an aside, with armchairs in metro cities firmly intact, some of us still choose to make light of Patanjali’s Instagram. (Which, ironically, scores better organic engagement than some top-tier fashion brands.) I personally find this incredibly interesting to see, especially because a new internet is finally showing up.
Between 2003 and 2014, the Indian web looked like a rip-off of the Western web. We had an Indian Hotmail in Rediff, an Indian MSN in Sify, an Indian Craigslist in Sulekha, and the storied Indian Amazon in Flipkart. Where new concepts abroad were taking over, Indians were quick to borrow: Orkut, Hi5 took on social networking. And we find ourselves here, where Google and Facebookaggregate demand for search and social networking to the ad industry’s disdain. Marketers and media buyers are clearly pressured to justify spends on both platforms despite a series of scandals. Where else will we go?
Let’s not lose sight of what’s happening in the trenches. New behaviors are taking over categories like gaming, news, and social networking: Teen Patti is fueling mobile gaming growth. India’s fastest growing news app isn’t from the oracular Times Internet stable, it’s NewsDog - a lightweight app focused on regional languages. For ecommerce and retail, Flipkart or Amazon aren’t the most exciting players: join your hands for Meesho, a service helping independent users sell over WhatsApp. And social media, well, TikTok is now #1 in App Stores world over after its success in India. (More on this in a bit.) How do you create content, much less build a brand, that works for users on NewsDog, Meesho, or TikTok?
Truth be told, content marketing synonymous with the millennial mindset is undergoing a seismic shift. And there are several rules up for questioning in terms of creating the right kind of content for these platforms. A long-standing meme inside advertising agencies is that every brand’s target audience is now an 18–35 year old millennial. The result oftentimes isn’t pretty. Creatives are equally tapped out: using the same platforms to reach the same aggregated cohort of the most valuable consumer on the planet, there’s almost no way users will remember, despite “creative effectiveness” in the category. Today, advertising is a tax poor people pay, to quote Scott Galloway.
The future will almost certainly be different: The fastest growing cohort of users on the Indian Internet are in rural India. How many? 732 million users. Metro city growth is all but tapped out. Google’s focus is the next billion users: Free Wi-Fi at over 400 railway stations, Neighbourly, Files by Google and Google Pay (previously known as Files Go and Tez respectively) aren’t made for the 300 million internet users. Google isn’t alone, Instant Games on Facebook Lite is made for internet-immature Android users. Uber Lite is targeted at Indian tier-II towns, and it’s close to a branding exercise for the next 200 million cab hailers in the country. When it comes to Indian internet penetration, there’s a 75 percent headroom to grow, and these users are going to dominate behaviour.
Further, it’s projected there will be 536 million Indian internet language users by 2021, in contrast to 199 million users in English. Going local has never meant more.
The answer might be in getting closer user behaviour now adapts and shifts; yes, every brand wants the prized cohort in 18-35, but that will soon no longer mean a metro internet user fluent in English. No one you _know_uses WhatsApp Stories, but that’s the point. With 450 million users, It’s bigger than Snapchat globally, and the biggest application of Stories in the Indian internet.
For the past 20 years of web advertising, money has moved from serving awareness of a brand to serving its bottom line. That’s why much of it is performance marketing rather than branding marketing. Several brands even have internal teams to track media effectiveness and paid media strategy, which then defines brand budgets. ROI is a burgeoning question. But this incentive of payments on the internet can no longer drive brand strategy on digital.
Research and development that begins with consumer research can influence not just the brand, but the company’s business model entirely. Agencies and marketers need to do better to not just identify shifting behaviour, but to build for it. For agencies, it’s an existential need to get closer to the strategic direction of brands. The rise of creative consultancies such as PWC Strategy& and Accenture Interactive lends itself to this trend. I’ve tried to avoid the C-word, alas: China. We find ourselves in an eerily similar situation to how user behaviour in China is shaping the internet experience for all of us. In many ways Facebook and the rest are trying to keep up. Here’s evidence. A Chinese takeover of Indian app stores offers clues into emerging use cases.
A few notable examples from the Indian internet in 2018:
Mobile gaming and e-sports are ready to establish themselves as entertainment players: while the west fawned over Fortnite, India made PUBG a riot. We leap-frogged the entire PC-gaming and console era and went straight to mobile. Gaming recently registered the fastest growth in the media and entertainment sector.
In social networking, TikTok might be cringeworthy for some and is a medium of self-expression for others. With 20 million monthly active users in India, as Hardik Rajgor writes, has eroded the divide between rural-urban audiences. Bytedance, TikTok’s parent company, is raising funds to become the most valuable startup in the world. (Uber clearly has bigger fish to fry, with a potential $120 billion IPO.) ShareChat recently saw its valuation grow 7 times in 2018, and is now looking for India’s next viral talent. Bigo TV showcases a new world for Indian content where creators can monetize social influence heralding a new era of micropayments.
None of this is easy to stay on top of, but this is where the next generation of brands are starting to find their footing – almost unseen. By adapting quickly, we can build for the underground internet movement, and set a precedent for everyone else. Besides, your brief is going to compel you to break the metaphorical clutter. Now you know where to look.
November 23, 2017
(Published first on AdAge India.)
I stumbled upon advertising — it was not the first, second, or even my third option. My time away from college was largely spent on internet experiments, which eventually got me to ask, “how can I play with the ways of computers, the web, and its media all the time?” After a rather circuitous route, I reached Dentsu Webchutney — where so much of what I’ve wanted to learn and do is right there to imbibe. These are some of my observations while working in advertising for six months:
Opportunity is all around you: Advertising is fun to work in because it’s designed to be an ideas business. In it, people are inclined to listening irrespective of who’s talking (an insight is always around the corner.) This is encouraging for someone new who inevitably takes some time to acquaint themselves with the dynamics of the firm. They notice what can be better. It’s unlikely that everything is in place, so building and fixing things is a happy necessity. Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls, therefore trusting our gut to charge forward is the cost of progress which also happens to be well rewarded in advertising.
Help? At your service: As much as I might believe that the world is on my shoulders to make things great, no one person can do it all — it’s not a college assignment (XIC Represent!). It is a team effort with collaboration at its core. In hindsight, it’s obvious: oftentimes, the same problems I’ve had have been experienced by fifty times as many people! — they’ve already dealt with the simple (timesheets, I’m looking in your direction) and the complex (emotions around the first campaign/pitch). Sometimes, given the context of rapid growth, some problems are entirely new to the company (establishing a Slack channel.)
Kill your darlings: In the passage of time, prioritisation has become, well, a priority. Advertising is a crash course on the saying, “you can do anything but not everything.” It is about identifying highest-leverage opportunities — for the agency, for the client, and for your fulfilment SIMULTANEOUSLY. All sides want something great, so nixing what’s low-leverage (“kill your darlings”) while managing expectations is the way to achieve balance. Saying no to myself has been necessary for no more than discipline. I’ve realised, the more time an idea spends in my head, the less critically I think of it, so rapid iteration helps reduce the cost of failure, without the peril of getting obsessed with it. Maintaining a work notebook has helped get over these ideas — bad in retrospect — with joy rather than spite for lack of execution.
Make some noise: Voicing out is necessary when immediate solutions are not available and there are multiple moving parts. If it’s software you can’t do without, make a case for it. A big learning is that an agency should not be fixed in its ways, and that its people have a moral responsibility to help shape what it can be. If there’s a better way, voice out, and be persistent to a point where you get to prove it with performance. One surefire way to cloud objective evaluation of a problem is to complain — then it becomes about the person and not the problem: always focus on why it needs solving. (Thanks for the Macs!)
Kinds of mistakes: Marty Neumeier once proclaimed, “In the realm of creativity, mistakes aren’t mistakes. They’re clues. Each one reveals a part of the mystery you’re trying to solve.” But there is a difference. Mistakes made out of ignorance in goal-defined areas are not worthy of neither reward nor “sincere apologies”/self-loathing — it’s faster to move forward and fix it for good. This is conveyed multiple times through #NoExcuses at Dentsu Webchutney. However, mistakes in pursuit of ideas or areas of high ambiguity should encourage a high failure rate. Lessons from these are carried forward, so talking about them makes it easier to shape collective thought around a problem.
Getting your hands dirty: In an agency, one gets to see how the proverbial sausage is made. Coordination is prized, and just sitting next to my amazing colleagues — account managers, video producers, technologists, copywriters, media folks — has brought out deep appreciation for what they do and how their pieces fit into an execution. This is invaluable. It enables identifying relative competencies to get work done either by seeking help or acquiring the skill myself. Hands-on involvement in any project is possible: there’s understandable tension in how resources are allocated. (Constraints inspire creativity, as they say.) The set up enables one to take advantage of a startup mindset where “a great idea is not 90 percent of the work,” so it’s useful to acquire a holistic outlook.
Hobby-friendly workspaces: I learned from a colleague who brought in his talent for impersonations — and deep observational skills — to work on a concept for a web series. He’s YouTube proficient, and so now we get to film a low-budget (but good for the agency, fulling for its people, and high-leverage) series, even if it’s never released. Taking initiative towards natural inclinations at work has made it a rich experience for me, since people are around to refine and listen. These bursts bring a feeling of contributing to a culture — and finding permissionless progress elsewhere is hit and miss.
Why can’t this happen in other industries? Digital-first agencies need people to experiment with everything new to pass on benefits to consumers/brands. It’s a playground in the best sense of the word. The opportunity is enticing: we help shape the internet & media on it, while also defining use cases; this endeavour requires patience and irreverence. Instead of falling in love with the goal (as university education “imparts”), there’s value in learning to fall in love with everything that supports the outcome. I look forward to what’s to unfold in this journey.
March 26, 2017
Last week I substituted my handheld supercomputer with a book. This is after months of trying to read books regularly: I have attempted to change my habits consciously with Audible, iBooks, the Kindle app, but the convenience of my iPhone — it‘s right there in my pocket — coupled with the number of things I can accomplish on it1 frequently distract me from achieving such behavioural change.
The motivation to substitute the iPhone’s dominating place in my hand is two-fold. (1) To get through my pile of books, and (2) To rely less on the internet for the sum of knowledge available; it‘s shaping up to represent a modern version of the Library of Alexandria. The web feels angrier than ever and this distorts the quality of what’s published on it.
I have tried to leave the book in my bag as a reminder to read every time I pick something out, but this is just a placebo. I feel good about the act, but ultimately do not read the book. Holding it in my hand instead of the iPhone makes a world of difference to my subconscious mind. The Kindle is an obvious option to read books, but I want to get away from a digital screen.
Director‘s luck: Sapiens was on top of the pile. I had an epiphany reading this book; convenience and its unintended side-effects is covered extensively in it. Yuval Noah Harari draws analogies between the Agriculture Revolution and how Homo sapiens behave today in different contexts. He says we are caught in the Luxury Trap2 (p. 98, paperback print edition):
One of history‘s few iron laws is that luxuries tend to become necessities and to spawn new obligations. Once people get used to a certain luxury, they take it for granted. Then they begin to count on it. Finally they reach a point where they can‘t live without it. […]
Nowadays I can dash off an email, send it halfway around the globe, and (if my addressee is online) receive a reply a minute later. I‘ve saved all that trouble and time, but do I leave a more relaxed life?
Sadly not. We thought we were saving time; instead we revved up the treadmill of life to ten times its former speed and made our days more anxious and agitated. […]
Nobody plotted the Agricultural Revolution or sought human dependence on cereal cultivation. A series of trivial decisions aimed mostly at filling a few stomachs and gaining a little security had the cumulative effect of forcing ancient foragers to spend their days carrying water buckets under a scorching sun.
Sounds familiar. “Iatrogenesis” means harm resulting from a treatment. For instance: Slack wants to kill email, but it‘s bringing forth workplace anxiety in a different form. The iPhone and its ecosystem simultaneously makes everything available, but also draws away from nearly everything else. Writing time is merged with photo-editing time is merged with the kingpin on mobile: communications — and I convince myself it is worth the investment in time and attention. This is modern millennial busywork. It‘s a cycle Homo Sapiens finds itself in often — there‘s 45,000 years of evidence to back up this very trait.
The result of this exercise has been net positive:
The change was not easy, it came after months of detours, experiments and frustration regarding my habits.
This is not an exercise in mindfulness. But I find it interesting that this “inconvenience” brings with it mindfulness in a different setting altogether. I’m thinking and engaging with the world through the lens of the author with zero switching costs. In 2015, upon undertaking a spring cleaning for media I access, I hoped I would not have to do something like it in 2017. This experience has been a flushing of the mind — far more than a spring cleaning: tiny changes in habits lead to big behavioural changes. And vice versa.
Hey, look, I am inclined to write more as well.
Phil Schiller, on the 10th anniversary of the iPhone: “iPhone is how we make voice and FaceTime calls, how we shoot and share Live Photos and 4K videos, how we listen to streaming music, how we use social media, how we play games, how we get directions and find new places, how we pay for things, how we surf the web, do email, manage our contacts and calendars, how we listen to podcasts, watch TV, movies and sports, and how we manage our fitness and health.”↩
August 16, 2016
It’s a simple fact that branding wouldn’t exist without massive quantities of ads being shown to people for whom the ads are irrelevant. Few of us would know the brands of Procter & Gamble, Unilever, L’Oreal, Coca-Cola, Nestlé, General Motors, Volkswagen, Mars or McDonald’s (the current top ten brand advertisers worldwide) if not for the massive amounts of money those companies spend advertising to people who will never buy their products but will damn sure known those products’ names. (Don Marti explains this well.)
A hard fact that the advertising industry needs to face is that there is very little appetite for ads on the receiving end. People put up with it on TV and radio, and in print, but for the most part they don’t like it. (The notable exceptions are print ads in fashion magazines and other high-quality publications. And classifieds.)
Appetites for ads, and all forms of content, should be consumers’ own. This means consumers need to be able to specify the kind of advertising they’re looking for, if any. Even then, the far more valuable signal coming from consumers is (or will be) an actual desire for certain products and services.
I’ll be sure to read up a lot more on this subject of massive interest.
August 4, 2016
Brainstorming isn’t pleasant; it isn’t supposed to be. It’s a storm! A storm of thoughts and a wave of possibilities.
Writing is fun too. More soon. Thank you, Tapan.
July 7, 2016
I set up a new Favourite Links page this past weekend. The page is updated automatically to include newest links using IFTTT’s Dropbox and Pocket channels.
All I have to do is favourite a link on Pocket and the recipe appends a Markdown-formatted line to a plain text file in Dropbox:
This works with items already favourited on Pocket. To get the recipe to trigger, I just go to my favourites and click on an item I want on Favourite Links. That’s it.
I’m setting up Instapaper to work similarly, although it’s far less reliable than Pocket in my tests so far.
June 15, 2016
A selection of high-resolution photographs available for your use under the Creative Commons 4.0 licence. Enjoy.
May 23, 2016
I see Apple “monetizing” Siri simply as a way to sell more devices — more iPhones now, more iPads (and who knows, maybe Macs?) in the future. Siri could be the interface to future products, like tiny little Nano-sized devices, or home entertainment systems. Google’s ad-driven model disrupted Microsoft’s pay-for-software-licenses model. Apple’s just-buy-our-devices-and-look-at-all-the-cool-shit-you-get-with-them model could disrupt Google’s ad-driven model.
The just-buy-our-devices model has worked for 18 years for Apple in the personal computing market. Horace Dediu calls this market unforgiving: almost all its competitors are dead or dying. As the personal computing market matures overall1, however, cracks in this very model are beginning to show. Consider un-Apple-like moves of selling 16 GB iPhones/iPads2 and offering 5 GB out-of-the-box iCloud storage—ways to up-sell buyers which work surprisingly well from a financial standpoint. For the ecosystem as a whole, they suck:
None of these issues are undocumented. Apple services is perceived to have a limited addressable market. Google Services works everywhere; Microsoft Office works everywhere; AWS is platform-agnostic. A services story is incomplete without addressing the issue of cross-platform support to monetize as many users as possible. This puts pressure on Apple’s model as physical device sales slow down: The company will continue to make contentious decisions on hardware and the default software/services experience to up-sell users as it’s currently in this strange matrix depending on high profit margins on both sides. The tenth-generation iPhone will most certainly differentiate between the 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch models in camera/memory/storage capacities not only to increase iPhone ASP but also make up for lost margin to increase default services options/iCloud storage.
I hesitate to write this post before Apple plays its cards at WWDC 2016 but I believe Apple is, right now, going through a very difficult shift trying to match expectations as a hardware manufacturer in a physical-device-as-cloud-endpoint world.
This brings me to my final point: while Apple’s model is under pressure, it does not warrant yelling from the rooftops. Apple the company has pivoted in nearly every decade of its existence: Apple I to Apple II in the ’70s; Apple II to Macintosh in the ’80s; Macintosh to iPod in early 2000s; iPod to iPhone in 2007. New Apple excels at product/profit shift in mature markets in the middle of major company-wide pivots. The Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X transition while the pivot to handheld devices/consumer electronics was underway: iTunes and iPod were developed in quick succession as points of leverage. The transition to Intel chips in Macs just before pivoting to the iPhone company: iPad, iMessage, iOS 7, Apple Watch serve as points of leverage today. They are developed to manage shifts within the pivot itself: low-cost PC threat in a mobile world? iPad. IM solution? iMessage; Dated mobile UI design in a world of high-resolution displays? iOS 7; Wearables and smartphone extension points? Apple Watch; Music streaming? Apple Music; The services shift is no different. If AI development is accelerating and if components are reusable, an educated guess would be that Apple, the product company of our time, can build things people want and can turn this to become a point of leverage in the future, too. Apple moves fast. It remains to be seen how well Apple rides the iPhone/services wave and builds Apple Watch, Beats, Apple TV as multi-billion dollar3 businesses. Before it publicly reveals its next major pivot, of course.
By “personal computing market” I mean the concept as a whole: the hardware/software model encapsulating desktops, laptops, smartphones, tablets.↩
Ask yourself if you truly believe 16 GB baseline models exist for enterprise/education markets. Because if you do, I have a bridge to sell you.↩
A multi-billion dollar business at Apple scale is $5-15 billion.↩
May 19, 2016
I’ve sacrificed short form content consumption on the web in favour of books. This is my bookshelf, current as of 28 April 2019.
Book recommendations are always welcome.
May 3, 2016
I left Brindavan post-prayer to Mathura at 10 a.m. Unknowingly, I got on the wrong train to Agra (for which I was jailed briefly at Agra station). Saw the Taj Mahal in all its glory and visited the magnificent Agra Fort at 4 p.m.; I blew away a few hours from 6:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at the Agra Railway Station before boarding a train to Chennai.
April 18, 2016
(Also published in The New Indian Express.)
The Jagriti Yatra sounds crazy: It’s fourteen days on a train around India, starting (and ending) in Mumbai, with over 450 amazing individuals who intend to cover twelve cities meeting role-models like Bunker Roy in Rajasthan, Anshu Gupta in Delhi, M. S. Swaminathan in Chennai, amongst others. And this description—the one of the outer journey only just scratches the surface of what this experience offers. It’s the inner journey—the touchy-feely bit—that takes the experience further.
Primarily, the Jagriti Yatra aims to ignite the spirit of entrepreneurship in its Yatris. Entrepreneurship is fascinating: it goes all the way from running a provisions shop to building services that shape how billions of people communicate. What remains common throughout this spectrum of businesses is that they’re about change: change in society, change in power structures, change in ownership of one’s fortunes. A trait common amongst operators of these businesses is, by their candid admission, perseverance. I had a chance to meet people from diverse economic, social, and educational backgrounds doing remarkable work in a sincere effort to effect change. The Jagriti Yatra simultaneously levels the playing field and encourages its Yatris to level up together. The energy, enthusiasm, and passion is infectious to say the very least.
From meeting a dropout from school who’s representing India at Australian Rules Football (!) and effecting change at Dharavi in Mumbai to a married Rajasthani woman leading development in her village through engagement of dozens of women in sewing and knitting clothes. Slowly but surely, I learned about the role-models around me through meticulous activities conducted on the train. Their willingness to share anecdotes of their respective struggles made me reconsider how I had dealt with such a situation in the past. They lent a strong hand in conditions unfamiliar to me and taught me a whole lot about camaraderie and the importance of caring about not just the work we do, but also about how we actually do it.
During the Jagriti Yatra, I found friends like Shubham, who, in school, started an NGO in Nagpur which is mission agnostic; working wherever and whenever resources are needed. I met Asit from Ahmedabad who wants to change the perception around drinking water. I heard the story of Shruti from Chennai whose organisation trains MNCs post-layoffs. I met friends like Deepti and Abhishek who share my wanderlust for travel and photography. People such as Brendan and Afnaan from Australia who’re exploring their respective place in this world. Perhaps it was difficult to relate to one person entirely, but it sure wasn’t hard to find people with stories relatable to my own.
Recognising that not everyone has a chance to get their queries answered within time-bound visits at each location, the Jagriti team organises sessions on the train in-transit by representatives from every institution we visit in our journey. The representatives hold comprehensive sessions on their area of expertise and devote generous amounts of time on topics ranging from revenue models to design and user-testing to life and philosophy. Despite a packed schedule where days would begin at 5 a.m. and end at 1 a.m. the following day, it was upon the Yatris themselves to make time for peace and quiet. This was a true test of prioritisation and delaying gratification: doing what’s important over what we wanted to do for ourselves. Not lost upon us was just how well the Jagriti Yatra is organised considering the number of variables at play when it comes to managing logistics of such a journey (the Jagriti team is a part of a larger NGO, run by working professionals who, in the course of several weeks in December bring this together.)
Perhaps the greatest lesson here is of shedding entitlement and managing expectations. Here’s so many of us on a three-tier non-A/C train, going through climates at a fast clip, while trying to learn and grow. There was a rush of emotion I couldn’t fully comprehend and appreciate when the Jagriti Yatra ended. We unconsciously take our conditions for granted: Our friendships, our resources, and the conditions around us. I won’t divulge too much about what the Jagriti Yatra exposed us to but I will say this: enabling change is about noticing what’s wrong with how things are done by existing systems. It’s also an important lesson in doing incredible things for society with the fabulous constraint of limited resources—pushing through the self-doubt and noise of people who don’t understand why you do what you do, and the discomfort that comes with taking responsibility of the change you’re a part of.
August 5, 2015
In the brilliant film Ex Machina the following exchange between two protagonists stuck with me:
Nathan_: You know this guy, right? — Jackson Pollock. — Jackson Pollock. That’s right. The drip painter. Okay. He let his mind go blank, and his hand go where it wanted. Not deliberate, not random. Some place in between. They called it automatic art. Let’s make this like Star Trek, okay? Engage intellect._
Caleb_: Excuse me?_
Nathan_: I’m Kirk. Your head’s the warp drive. Engage intellect. What if Pollock had reversed the challenge. What if instead of making art without thinking, he said, “You know what? I can’t paint anything, unless I know exactly why I’m doing it.” What would have happened?_
Caleb_: He never would have made a single mark._
We keep looking for That Perfect Moment to start doing anything. Until that time comes you essentially feel like you’re putting up with the status quo. That it’ll change some day. Spoiler: That Perfect Moment never comes, and neither does any perfect storm of events. If you keep waiting for the mythical perfect moments, you’re wasting today, right now, and indulging in your lethargy of doing real dirty work.
You’ve got to play around with what you have today before you can satisfactorily move on to the next thing. Experiment, see what works and what doesn’t work. Evaluate, adjust your sails and go on to experiment with something else. Repeat. You really don’t want to be the kind of person who holds wrong positions dearly. Question everything.
July 28, 2015
Tom’s got a 9-to-5 corporate gig he really doesn’t like. He’s just graduated from college, and sees himself as sort of a creative person. He’s not sure what he’s doing at this gig in the first place. Money? Not really. Career growth? “What’s that?”.
The good news is that Tom’s parents tell him they’re on his side and he can leave if he wants. His friends tell him that he should probably consider other options and that this really isn’t worth it if he doesn’t like it. He jumps. He quits after putting in just twelve shifts, and without a plan.
Tom spends the next year drifting from one place to the next. He dabbles with cooking: starts going for classes twice a week but stops soon after. He takes up painting and puts up a couple of things on this tumblr he started. No updates in four months. I wonder what Tom’s up to now. Oh, he’s applying to a few colleges for further studies? Cool. Which subjects? “Um”.
Stop taking easy exits. They make you complacent. People around you try to make you feel good about the steps you’re about to take. Some people contest your decisions, but you shrug them away. You, defensively, quantify your dislike. And you get into the habit of doing this again and again and again.
See yourself in a sub-optimal situation? Not really sure where you’re going to go? Don’t just quit what you’re doing right now. Persist. Fight. Make your exit.
May 18, 2015
A reason I hear quite often for not doing something is inertia. I don’t know what this means, so I googled it:
inertia ɪˈnəːʃə: noun
- a tendency to do nothing or to remain unchanged.
In simpler terms: it’s comfort. You could blame inertia and laugh off your lethargy for not moving in any direction, or you could take time to, you know, identify where you stand today. Maybe start with this: “Am I really happy in this crowd, amongst all the mediocrity I’ve pointed out and mocked on so many occasions?”
It might also be worth asking yourself if your insecurity about a bunch of things is the reason behind inertia. Make a list of these insecurities (choice by elimination is particularly useful). It’ll help you identify your priorities and incentives.
When you’re ready — and hopefully that’s not too far away from today — take the steps that only you can. The world isn’t static, and you’re in a hurry.
May 11, 2015
Back in school I had an unapologetic obsession with football: I was a rabid fan by all standards.
Later, in college, my long infatuation with Apple matured to become a relationship. I was obsessed. This came at a cost: my obsession with football went away. The obsession with Apple introduced me to design. To engineering. To media. To culture. And to the many many aspects of human excellence and craftsmanship I follow today, and aspire to match the standards of someday.
My love for Apple remains true. From this company, though, I’ve also learnt the value of perseverance. Apple does all R&D indoors, and maintains a crazy level of secrecy. Apple realises that people working on ideas don’t need fickle customers commenting on their ideas before they’re parts of a product worth shipping. People at Apple roll. The audience witnessing their effort is small, yet appreciative of the effort, with eyes on the future and what the idea can become.
A small audience is great, and probably the best thing that can happen to you as someone working on an idea. A small audience gives you the liberty to take time and get things right. You can hone your skills in front of them, and they’re going to tell you when you can do something better.
I learnt of the importance of a small audience when I started taking photos on my phone and sharing them. I had no idea what I was doing, but it was something I was sufficiently interested in. I would’ve failed without even trying if a lot of people told me I actually sucked in the beginning. The suggestions mattered.
Now, I want to try to middle (occasionally). It’s what Fred Wilson and Seth Godin do. Day in day out. It’s an act of perseverance. I can’t match their insight nor their experience — experience which spans the entirety of my age on this planet — but I can try to do my own thing and figure it out as I go.
The best part? Almost no one is watching.
May 6, 2015
To begin: I am not the most proficient person around at presenting and speaking to a large set of people.
I’m flattered every time someone asks me how I make photos. (Especially because I have no idea what I’m doing and someone likes it? Whoa.) I thought I’d reach out to the HR folks at work and tell them my story. We worked together on the blog post, and it struck me that I should consider going beyond the blog post to hold a session for people who were interested in learning more about iPhone/mobile photography. HR was happy to oblige again. It’s tiny things like this that brings about confidence and excites me about doing more.
Back to the elephant in the room: presenting publicly. I had about a week to prepare for this and looked at these two resources:
The 10-20-30 rule encourages presenters to make the following choices:
I didn’t adhere to the first part of the rule as I wanted to eschew use of excessive transitions and animations. It saves time to just skip ’em… and focus on other things. So I made a bunch of slides (80 in all), and learned to make use of master slides in Keynote. The presentation slightly exceeded the twenty minute mark, but that’s all right. I had no trouble meeting the thirty point font guideline since a lot of the presentation was visual.
The deck should complement your presence, not take the stage.
May 2, 2015
For context: I’m coming from an 11-inch MacBook Air. This is the 13-inch, early 2015 version.
I will be using this computer for a long, long time; I’m really happy with it.
April 30, 2015
I’ve never really done a spring cleaning until now (or realised that I was in that mode all together) but I did some this time semi-consciously.
Here’s what I did:
Importantly, this cleaning has given me some perspective. Digital hoarding is pointless because everything moves quickly. By cutting down on what I choose to access, I’m making time for new things like reading and communicating with people who matter. I typed this in the morning instead of checking Twitter. I also get the idea of discipline: It shouldn’t clutter in the first place. I would be disappointed in myself if I did a spring cleaning in, say, 2017.
Being ignorant about the internet, its impact on society, and its disruptive effect on so many industries isn’t great, but being cognisant about your use almost always is.
Update: May 1, 2015
I added point number 9 on podcasts.
September 15, 2014
I saw a drone in use on my walk back home from work last night. I asked the drone-owner (droner?) if I could take a video of it. He obliged.
I have three apps capable of shooting video: Camera.app, Hyperlapse, and Snapchat. (Vine and Instagram aren’t on my phone, and I didn’t even think about WhatsApp’s built-in video shooting capability. I never use it.)
Camera.app wouldn’t work for me because I knew from the outset that I wanted to share it somewhere. This includes Vine, and/or Snapchat. I would need to increase the speed of the video or crop appropriately, as there was initial set up time. So, I made a split-second decision to take the video on Hyperlapse, partially because it is new and novel, and partially because it would allow me to speed up the video. Also because there’s no uploading from the camera roll on Snapchat (not yet anyway).
I want to share this through my Snapchat story with my closest friends, but quickly realised that (a) my friends probably don’t care, and (b) Snapchat also doesn’t allow prior footage to be shared. But an addition to the Snapchat story can be saved to the Camera Roll. Alas, 10 seconds of recording was a deal-breaker.
I need Vine to share this Hyperlapse on Twitter as it does not have native video sharing (what year is this?). I got lucky: Vine finally enabled uploading videos from the camera roll last month. Turns out that Vine doesn’t support Hyperlapse videos, and any attempt to upload shows blacked-out footage. Fail.
Needless to mention, all of this would be easier if I didn’t have such first world problems.
Sharing via WhatsApp to a group of people who don’t care it is.
February 6, 2014
“Why am I writing?,” “Who am I writing for?” and “What am I going to write?” are questions that come in my mind often (and I imagine, in anyone’s mind.) They came up in my mind at different intervals between the time I decided that I wanted to write, actually started writing, and actually publishing. All too often the gap between when these questions came up was too long, and the journey seemed incessantly arduous. Fortunately, I got to read some amazing and inspiring things this past month, and I found answers to all three questions
For the most part, my friends and I share our thoughts on any one of the plethora of IM options, or on Twitter. I’ve never really kept anything trackable, and these uninvited questions probably had something to do with it. I have a reading habit and genuinely try to follow a lot of great writing day-in, day-out. Perhaps even more fortunately, it all just came together. Answers to questions might have appeared and disappeared forever, but some how they tied together this time, and this exists.
M.G. Siegler started a project where he attempts to write 500 words a day. He says:
I’ve decided that I’d like to write more this year. Or, more specifically, I’d like to write more regularly this year. Last year, I wrote quite a bit, but I’d do so in large chunks of time and words and I never felt like I achieved a good cadence in my writing. So I’m switching things up.
M.G. isn’t just switching things up by writing every day. He’s switching things up by writing about things he likes. I tap away 500 words a day, echoing the same opinion over and over again, only each time it’s to a different recipient. The net result of this isn’t particularly useful, there’s no tangible evidence that I’ve become better at writing or that my thought process is actually evolving over a period of time.
Instinctively, I can tell that I’ve become better, but what drew me towards this effort is that it suggests a do-able way to actually know that I’ve become better.
So, Why am I writing? I’m writing for cadence, clarity, and to express myself._Why?_ and What? might appear to be similar questions, but are actually quite different.
There was an interesting debate about recognition and getting credit for what you write. It’s extremely hard to get noticed when you’re in a huge echo chamber. Recognition is nice to have, not a must have. Linus Edwardshad a really great take on what he calls “concentric circles”. He has an optimistic view on the future of reporting and writing. Although the post was reflective on a subset of voices (albeit an influential Apple community) in technology journalism, similar references can be applied to almost any kind of writing.
What happens to someone who does think about this? Whose intent to start writing is recognition, because that’s what you want, right? It’s not simple, and it’s easy to lose track of who you’re doing this for. An excerpt from “The Intrinsic Value of Blogging” by Matt Mullenweg:
The antidote I’ve found for this is to write for only two people. First, write for yourself, both your present self whose thinking will be clarified by distilling an idea through writing and editing, and your future self who will be able to look back on these words and be reminded of the context in which they were written.
Second, write for a single person who you have in mind as the perfect person to read what you write, almost like a letter, even if they never will, or a person who you’re sure will read it because of a connection you have to them (hi Mom!).
Once you stay honest and true to yourself, it’ll reflect in your work, whether it’s writing or anything else. After all, it’s for one of two people.
Reading this lifted a huge burden. I’m surrounding my self with metrics related to what I’m writing, and eventually the metrics will take over me. It’s important to note that this does not discourage sharing your work. It’s just about knowing who you’re doing it for. You never know who can end up liking your stuff, providing constructive feedback, and maybe even being influenced by it, so sharing it is a part of the overall process.
You’ve found why and who you’re writing for, now, what are you writing for and what are you going to actually write?
The majority of the interview covers the John’s method for creating albums, but when he’s asked what he likes to be known for, John talks about wanting to shift back to being someone who creates, not just someone who comments. Around two minutes into the episode, he remarks:
I’ve been writing this sort of commentary on the world and what I was formerly known for — and what I prefer to do — is make primary source material. You know, if you’re making a song, or if you’re writing a story, that is source material. It’s primary. It’s the thing that did not exist before. You’re not commenting. Presumably, your song is not commenting on some earlier song, or if it is, it’s doing it in an inventive way. It isn’t this chattering sort of criticism and culture digestion that is so much of I guess what we call content — Internet content, which is just like, “Oh, this just came out and now I’m talking about it and now I’m talking about this other guy who was talking about it.”
Writing for primary source material is a noble goal, but again, it comes to the overall topic of recognition being tied to a room with a lot of voices. If what you’re writing has primary source material as a goal, you’ll become a better narrator. I want to write to create primary source material.
A wise friend reminds me over and over again that Technology, Economics, Politics, are huge echo chambers. You can only go so far with the babble, though. Ideally you would like to create something of value, and it’s just not relegated to writing. What I’m going to write probably does fall in to an over crowded category, but my goal is to write original and interesting things. Build something that gives you The Builders High! I had an amazing experience between the time I wrote this and actually published it, where I really got an overview of the writing process, and learnt a lot.
It doesn’t matter.
Probably a peripheral question, but worth including here. In “Do You Want To Write?,” Rands, again: “Do you want to write? or think about writing?”
Well, I do write a lot. Just not channeled correctly. I just couldn’t get on with posting something of record. Rands has a lot of insight on the writing process, and not just the app that he’s referring to. Why not cancel out all noise and just focus on the craft of writing? What is there to lose when you’re writing about something that you like, for someone that cares about it, and when you have an answer to what and why you’re writing?
I got an email a few months ago from Tumblr that my Tumblr was a year old. It’s 470 days old so far, and the intention behind starting it was to write a whole lot more. So far I’ve conjured up one text post. I wanted to try Medium, so I got an invite while it was in beta, and managed one post on a topic that frustrated me a little.
Surely enough, I wrote this, and emailed Jim Dalrymple, telling him that I wanted to send this in for his brilliant magazine, and he was kind enough to ask for a draft, and I didn’t get around to doing that, probably spending more time not writing and drowning myself in self-doubt.
A week into my Squarespace trial1, I was trying to make a website to keep what I write, and then my eyes literally lit up when I saw this tweet. Naturally, I wanted to try it out, and here I am. It was no easy task coming to this decision of using Svbtle, and took a lot of consideration. I realised that tweaking the site is a never ending process and detracts me from writing. Why Svbtle? I’ll explain soon.2
Ideally, I would like to write 500-1000 words a week. It will give me tangible results, help me express myself better when it comes to things I like, be more nuanced in judgement when it comes to things I dislike, and I hope you enjoy reading it. I don’t know if I’ll be in a position to do the same a few months from now, but my goal is to get better at this. It’s a skill that’ll stay with me for the rest of my life.
Enough running around.